what peer review feedback did you choose to incorporate concerning your argument and why
Chapter xi. Developing a Convincing Argument
In this chapter, nosotros volition be applying the concepts presented to you in Affiliate x: Persuasion. Working through the self-practise exercise will help you to develop a strong, convincing statement on a topic of your pick. At the end of Department xi.3: Organizing Your Ideas, you will demand to produce an outline to show to your instructor.
xi.one Coming Upwardly With a Topic
Learning Objectives
- Identify the requirements for your persuasive essay
- Generate ideas on a topic for your persuasive essay
- Formulate a research question
- Create a working thesis showing your topic and your decision-making point of view
- Comport preliminary research
The Requirements This assessment is divided into three parts (the requirements of each are described beneath): A formal outline due week 11 A rough draft due week 12 A final draft due calendar week 13. You lot volition receive 2.5% each for parts 1 and two, and the last essay is worth 25%.
Essay 3: Persuasion (2.5 % +ii.v % +25%)
Choose a controversial topic on which you can base a persuasive give-and-take of 1,350 to 1,500 words.
You must:
- Demonstrate the application of dialectics and consideration of altering points of view
- Construct and follow a logical argument word
- Provide supporting evidence from five to seven supplemental sources and include a reference page and citations.
Part A: Essay 3: Persuasive formal outline/5 marks (two.5%) ** Due calendar week 11 **
Create a formal, sentence outline for your instructor's approval. You must include:
- A working thesis
- A working outline
- Topic sentences for each supporting paragraph
- Notes of how yous plan to develop your ideas
- The sourcing data of where you lot will go evidence to support your ideas.
You volition be marked on level of completion of the five components described above. Yous do not have to stick to the outline exactly when you first working on your draft, merely you volition need to demonstrate y'all have done some of the preliminary work.
Part B: Essay 3: Persuasive draft/ten marks (ii.5%) ** Due week 12 **
Create a kickoff draft of your persuasive essay. You must include:
- A complete introduction
- A complete conclusion
- Paragraph development
- A demonstration of idea development
- A typhoon reference page
Part C: Essay iii: Persuasive final submission/100 marks (25%) ** Due calendar week 13 **
Write a ane,350 to 1,500 give-and-take persuasive essay on a controversial topic. Utilise the thesis, bear witness, opposing argument, and concessionary statement every bit the footing for writing a total persuasive essay. You must include:
An engaging introduction
Articulate explanations of all the show you lot nowadays
A strong conclusion.
The Controversy A controversial topic is one on which people take strong views. Imagine the type of discussion that can become really heated, usually when the subject is something people are passionate almost. Just a person who is passionate about a particular issue does not necessarily hateful he or she recognizes the merits of the other view (although that often happens); it just ways that the person has nerveless bear witness (from a multifariousness of sources) and synthesized those ideas to get in at a detail bespeak of view. When you are trying to choose your topic for your persuasive paper, information technology is easier if you lot choose a topic nearly which you feel very strongly. You probably take realized by this signal that when you are writing, it is a lot easier to write about a topic you already have some background knowledge on, and something you are extremely interested in. This helps to appoint you lot and keep you interested in the writing process. No matter the topic you eventually determine to hash out, in that location are a few things you need to call back about before you begin the writing process. Yous volition need to make certain your subject is: Significant . Is a discussion of this topic one that has the potential to contribute to a field of study? Will it make an impact? This does non mean every discussion has to change lives, but it needs to be something relatively of import. For example, a significant topic would be to convince your reader that eating at fast-food restaurants is detrimental to people's cardiovascular organization. A less significant discussion would be if you were to try to convince your reader why one fast-nutrient restaurant is better than another. Singular . This means you lot need to focus on one subject. Using the fast-food eating place example, if you were to focus on both the effects on the cardiovascular and endocrine arrangement, the discussion would lose that singular focus and there would exist too much for you to cover. Specific . Like to the betoken above, your topic needs to be narrow enough to allow for you to really discuss the topic inside the essay parameters (i.e., give-and-take count). Many writers are afraid of getting as well specific considering they feel they will run out of things to say. If you develop the idea completely and give thorough explanations and enough of examples, the specificity should not be a problem. Supportable . Does evidence for what yous want to talk over really exist? There is probably some form of prove out there even for the most obscure topics or points of view. However, you need to remember you should use credible sources. Someone's opinions posted on a blog almost why one fast-food eating house is the all-time does non count as apparent support for your ideas.
Self – Practice Exercise 11.1
In previous chapters, you lot learned strategies for generating and narrowing a topic for a research paper. Review the list of general topics below. Also, think nearly which topics y'all experience very strongly.
Freewrite for five minutes on 1 of the topics below. Call back, you volition demand to focus your ideas to a manageable size for a v – to seven – page inquiry paper.
You are also welcome to cull another topic; yous may desire to double-check with your instructor if information technology is suitable. It is important to recall that yous desire your paper to be unique and stand out from others'; writing on overly mutual topics may non aid with this. Since we take already discussed the decease penalty as a grade of punishment in the last chapter and already developed ideas, yous should probably not cull this topic because your instructor wants you to demonstrate you accept applied the procedure of critical thinking on some other topic.
Identify the key words you volition utilise in the next self – practice exercise to preliminary research to narrow down your topic.
Some appropriate controversial topics are:
- Illegal immigration in Canada
- Bias in the media
- The role of religion in educational systems
- The possibility of life in outer infinite
- Modern twenty-four hour period slavery effectually the world, ie. Human being trafficking
- Foreign policy
- Television and advertising
- Stereotypes and prejudice
- Gender roles and the workplace
- Driving and cell phones
Formulating a Research Question
In forming a research question, y'all are setting a goal for your research. Your primary research question should be substantial enough to form the guiding principle of your paper, but focused enough to guide your inquiry. A potent inquiry question requires you not only to find information but likewise to put together different pieces of data, translate and clarify them, and effigy out what you retrieve. Equally you consider potential research questions, inquire yourself whether they would exist too hard or too like shooting fish in a barrel to reply.
To determine your enquiry question, review the freewriting you completed earlier. Skim through books, manufactures, and websites and list the questions yous take. (You may wish to use the 5WH strategy to help y'all codify questions.) Include unproblematic, factual questions and more circuitous questions that crave analysis and interpretation. Decide your principal question—the primary focus of your paper—and several subquestions that you will need to enquiry to respond that main question.
Here are the research questions Jorge will use to focus his research. Notice that his principal research question has no obvious, straightforward reply. Jorge will demand to research his subquestions, which accost narrower topics, to answer his master question.
Self – Practice EXERCISE 11.2
Using the ideas you came up with in Self – Do Do 11.one , create a research question yous would like to find the answer to through your research and persuasive paper development. This is something you will utilize to assistance guide you in your writing and to check back with to make certain you are answering that question along the way.
_________________________________________________________________________
Collaborate with a partner and share your questions. Draw your topic and point of view and ask your partner if that question connects to that topic and point of view .
Self Practice Exercise 11.three
Working with the topic you accept identified, use the research skills you learned in previous capacity to locate approximately v potentially useful print or electronic sources of information nearly the topic.
Create a list that includes the post-obit:
One subject-specific periodicals database probable to include relevant articles on your topic
Ii articles about your topic written for an educated general audience
At least one commodity well-nigh your topic written for an audience with specialized knowledge
Organize your list of resources into primary and secondary sources. What makes them either master or secondary? Pick i master source and one secondary source and write a sentence or ii summarizing the information that each provide s .
And then answer these questions:
What type of primary source did you cull? Who wrote it, and why? Do you think this source provides accurate information, or is it biased in some way?
Where did the information in the secondary source come up from? Was the author citing an initial study, slice of literature, or work of art? Where could you observe the primary source?
Self – practice EXERCISE 11.4
With the topic from Self – Practice Practise 11.1 and the preliminary research you lot conducted in Self – Practise 11.3 and referring to Section x.2: The Structure of a Persuasive Essay , develop a working thesis and scratch outline.
Note that after reading Section 11.2: Dialectics, you will most probable revise your outline.
How to B e Really Convincing Sometimes it can be very challenging to convince someone of your ideas and that your bespeak of view is valid. If your reader has strong contrary views or has had emotional experiences in the past continued to that topic, your job in persuading volition exist more challenging. However, if you lot consider your audience and tone (as discussed in Department 10.3: Beingness Disquisitional) and think about the answers to the following questions in C hecklist 11.1, Who Is My Audience? , you will be better able to predict possible objections your reader may have to your argument and address those accordingly. It will also aid you make recognize how much and what kind of groundwork information you need to provide your reader with context for your word.
Checklist 11.1 Who Is My Audience?
Who are my readers?
What exercise they already know on the discipline?
What are they likely to be interested in?
How impartial or biased are they?
Is the subject ane that may claiming their ethical or moral beliefs?
What values do we share?
What types of evidence volition be most effective?
Self – practice EXERCISE 11.5
Look back at the two persuasive essay examples in Section ten.4: Examples: Persuasi ve Essays . With a partner, discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each example. Look at the brownie, tone, ceremoniousness to audition, and completeness of the ideas presented.
Example 1 | |
Strengths | Weaknesses |
Example 2 | |
Strengths | Weaknesses |
Collaboration: W ith your partner, discuss how you could make each of these arguments stronger.
xi.2 Dialectics
Learning Objectives
- Explain the components, practice, and benefits of dialectical thinking
- Conduct a dialect discussion to consider other points of view on your topic
Every bit you read in Chapter 10, Department 10.3: Beingness Critical, a strong persuasive essay will respectfully identify and discuss perspectives of the aforementioned topic. When you do this, you are presenting a well-rounded and complete discussion to your reader that shows you have critically thought about the topic and have been selective in choosing your points. As a result, there is a higher probably that you volition convince your reader. The process of looking at multiple sides of a topic is called dialectics.
Dialectics is the human action of using logical reasoning to combine, juxtapose, or synthesize opposing ideas to arrive at a stiff conclusion.
The Components of Dialectics To brainstorm the dialectic procedure, y'all first need to come with an idea of what topic will exist discussed; this is the thesis backside the discussion. Once y'all have determined your thesis, through diverse methods (the easiest being discussion with someone else), you will explore opposing sides to the topic, somewhen discovering at to the lowest degree ane antithesis. Combining those 2 perspectives, you can then make your own conclusions. Maybe this process will result in you lot standing past the original thesis, or maybe the antonym is incredibly disarming and you will switch sides of the argument, or maybe y'all yet believe the original thesis but have there are other conditions that have credibility besides. This finish outcome is chosen the synthesis: the blending of ideas. Essentially, the procedure would wait like this:
Considering both your thesis and the discovered antonymous perspectives volition help you to arrive at a wider view of a topic: 1 that has more credibility. Looking back to the persuasive essay samples you read in Section 10.four and discussed in Cocky – Do Exercise 11.5, consider to what degree the authors best-selling opposing views. How did they justify their opinions? Consider how integrating dialectics into each of those arguments to a greater degree would take strengthened their points of view, ultimately making their arguments more convincing.
Self – practice EXERCISE 11. six
Based on the thesis " Governments use capital penalty as an effective tool for deterring violent offense , " answer the following questions and complete the tabular array.
What is your opinion on this argument? To what extent do you agree/disagree?
_____________________________________________________________________
Complete the table considering the thesis argument given higher up.
Starting time complete the side of the tabular array with ideas supporting the bespeak of view you described in question #1.
Then, challenge yourself to come upwardly with ideas (y'all may need to do a little bit of inquiry) that would back up the other side of the discussion.
Supporting th e statement | Against thursday east statement |
Collaboration: D iscuss your answers with a partner. Do you both take the same ideas, or can yous add to your list based on what your partner has come up with.
After coming upward with and considering the other perspective, has your indicate of view changed at all?
Do you lot notwithstanding stick by your same point of view 100 percent? Or do you concede that there are valid points from the other perspective?
Self – Exercise Exercise 11. seven /Discussion iii
Using both the scratch outline and the working thesis y'all created in Self – Exercise Exercise 11.4, create a table like the 1 you used in Self – Practice Exercise 11.six , only filling in the side with information that supports your thesis.
In one case you accept created that tabular array with your thesis given, share your table and thesis with a classmate.
Interact: Conduct a dialectic discussion on your topic and possible for and against the working thesis you presented. Add together whatsoever points to your original table.
Remember to be aware of the process of synthesis you take gone through. Did your original point of view alter at all? Is there annihilation yous tin can brand concessions on being valid? This may impact your thesis.
Using one or two of the opposing ideas your partner helped you come upwardly with, revise your scratch outline from Cocky – Practice Exercise xi.4.
11.3 Organizing Your Ideas
Learning Objectives
- Revise your working thesis
- Create an outline including your thesis and main and supporting points
- Determine an appropriate organizational structure for a persuasive essay that uses disquisitional analysis to connect your ideas and information taken from sources
For this section, you will need to refer dorsum to Department 10.two: The Construction of a Persuasive Essay to assistance yous slice your supporting and opposing ideas together.
Creating an Introduction and Thesis
The persuasive essay begins with an engaging introduction that presents the general topic. The thesis typically appears somewhere in the introduction and states the author's point of view.
Re – evaluate Your Working Thesis
A careful assay of your notes volition help yous re-evaluate your working thesis and determine whether you need to revise it. Remember that your working thesis was the starting point—not necessarily the end point—of your enquiry. You should revise your working thesis if your ideas inverse based on what you read. Even if your sources by and large confirmed your preliminary thinking on the topic, it is still a practiced idea to tweak the wording of your thesis to incorporate the specific details you learned from research.
Jorge realized that his working thesis oversimplified the bug. He however believed that the media was exaggerating the benefits of low-carb diets. However, his research led him to conclude that these diets did have some advantages. Read Jorge's revised thesis.
Tip
Avoid forming a thesis based on a negative claim. For example, "The hourly minimum wage is not high enough for the average worker to live on." This is probably a true statement, just persuasive arguments should make a positive instance. That is, the thesis argument should focus on how the hourly minimum wage is low or insufficient.
Self – practise Practise 11. 8
On a sheet of paper, use your working thesis and the revised outline from Self – Do Practice 11.7 and listing the types of evidence you might utilise in support of that thesis. Essentially, yous are expanding your outline to include more than source information.
Synthesizing and Organizing Information
By now, your thinking on your topic is taking shape. You have a sense of what major ideas to address in your newspaper, what points yous tin can easily support, and what questions or subtopics might need a little more thought. In short, you have begun the process of synthesizing information—that is, of putting the pieces together into a coherent whole.
It is normal to observe this office of the process a trivial difficult. Some questions or concepts may even so be unclear to you. You may not even so know how you will tie all of your research together. Synthesizing data is a complex, enervating mental task, and even experienced researchers struggle with it at times. A little uncertainty is often a skilful sign! Information technology means you are challenging yourself to piece of work thoughtfully with your topic instead of simply restating the aforementioned information.
Synthesiz ing Data
You have already considered how your notes fit with your working thesis. At present, take your synthesis a step farther. Organize your notes with headings that correspond to points and subpoints yous came upwards with through dialectics and compiled in your outline, which you presented to your instructor. Every bit you proceed, you lot might place some more than of import subtopics that were not function of your original plan, or y'all might decide that some points are not relevant to your paper.
Categorize information advisedly and continue to think critically well-nigh the cloth. Enquire yourself whether the sources are reliable and whether the connections between ideas are clear.
Think, your ideas and conclusions will shape the newspaper. They are the gum that holds the rest of the content together. Equally y'all work, brainstorm jotting down the big ideas you lot will use to connect the dots for your reader. (If you are non certain where to begin, effort answering your major research question and subquestions. Add and respond new questions equally advisable.) You might record these big ideas on viscid notes or type and highlight them inside an electronic document.
Jorge looked back on the listing of research questions that he had written down earlier. He changed a few to match his new thesis, and he began a rough outline for his newspaper.
You may be wondering how your ideas are supposed to shape the newspaper, particularly since you lot are writing a research paper based on your research. Integrating your ideas and your information from research is a circuitous procedure, and sometimes it can be hard to dissever the two.
Some paragraphs in your paper will consist mostly of details from your research. That is fine, as long as you explain what those details hateful or how they are linked. You should as well include sentences and transitions that show the relationship between different facts from your research by grouping related ideas or pointing out connections or contrasts. The upshot is that yous are non merely presenting information; you lot are synthesizing, analyzing, and interpreting it.
Plan How to Organize Your Paper
The final pace to consummate before outset your draft is to cull an organizational structure. For some assignments, this may be determined past the instructor's requirements. For instance, if you are asked to explore the impact of a new communications device, a cause-and-event structure is obviously appropriate. In other cases, you will need to determine the structure based on what suits your topic and purpose.
The purpose of Jorge's paper was primarily to persuade. With that in mind, he planned the post-obit outline.
Essay three: outline (2.5%)
Review the organizational construction discussed in Chapter x: Persuasion. Working with the notes you organized earlier, follow these steps to begin planning how to organize your newspaper.
Create an outline that includes your working thesis, major subtopics, and supporting points.
The major headings in your outline volition get sections or paragraphs in your paper. Remember that your ideas should form the backbone of the paper. For each major department of your outline, write a topic sentence stating the primary point you lot volition make in that section.
As you lot complete step 2, yous may find that some points are besides complex to explain in a sentence. Consider whether whatever major sections of your outline need to be broken up and jot down additional topic sentences as needed.
Review your notes and determine how the different pieces of information fit into your outline as supporting points.
Add together any sources y'all take identified that you programme on using to back up your ideas.
Collaboration
- Please share the outline you created with a classmate.
- Examine your classmate'southward outline and run into if any questions come to mind or if you lot run into any area that would benefit from an additional point or clarification. Return the outlines to each other and compare observations.
- After you accept discussed your formal outline with a classmate, submit information technology to your instructor for blessing.
You will receive up to ii.5% toward your final class depending on how thoroughly you lot take conducted a dialectical word and developed your outline.
11.4 Disquisitional Thinking and Research Applications
Learning Objectives
- Clarify source materials to determine how they support or refute the thesis
- Identify connections betwixt source materials and eliminate redundant or irrelevant source materials
At this point in your projection, yous are preparing to move from the research phase to the writing phase. You have gathered much of the information y'all will use, and before long you volition exist ready to begin writing your draft. This section helps you transition smoothly from one stage to the next.
Start writers sometimes attempt to transform a pile of note cards into a formal research paper without whatever intermediary step. This arroyo presents problems. The writer's original question and thesis may be buried in a flood of disconnected details taken from research sources. The first typhoon may nowadays redundant or contradictory information. Worst of all, the writer's ideas and voice may be lost.
An constructive inquiry paper focuses on the author's ideas—from the question that sparked the enquiry process to how the writer answers that question based on the inquiry findings. Earlier beginning a draft, or even an outline, good writers pause and reflect. They inquire themselves questions such as the post-obit:
How has my thinking changed based on my research? What accept I learned?
Was my working thesis on target? Practice I need to rework my thesis based on what I accept learned?
How does the information in my sources mesh with my enquiry questions and help me respond those questions? Take any boosted of import questions or subtopics come up that I will need to accost in my newspaper?
How do my sources complement each other? What ideas or facts recur in multiple sources?
Where do my sources disagree with each other, and why?
In this section, you will reflect on your inquiry and review the information you have gathered. Yous will determine what yous now call up nigh your topic. You will synthesize, or put together, different pieces of data that assistance you respond your research questions. Finally, you will determine the organizational construction that works best for your paper and revise the outline you have already made and had canonical to be a more formal sentence outline (an outline that contains more information like topic sentences, your supporting ideas organized more appropriately, and the sources you plan to use.
Selecting Useful Information
At this indicate in the research process, you lot have gathered data from a wide variety of sources. At present it is time to recollect about how you will use this data as a writer.
When you comport research, you keep an open mind and seek out many promising sources. You take notes on any information that looks similar it might help you lot reply your research questions. Oft, new ideas and terms come up in your reading, and these, as well, find their way into your notes. You may record facts or quotations that grab your attention even if they did not seem immediately relevant to your research question. By at present, you take probably amassed an impressively detailed collection of notes. You will not use all of your notes in your paper.
Good researchers are thorough. They look at multiple perspectives, facts, and ideas related to their topic, and they assemble a nifty deal of information. Effective writers, notwithstanding, are selective. They decide which data is well-nigh relevant and appropriate for their purpose. They include details that develop or explain their ideas—and they get out out details that do not. The author, not the pile of notes, is the controlling strength. The writer shapes the content of the research paper.
In Chapter 7: Sources: Choosing the Right Ones, y'all used strategies to filter out unreliable or irrelevant sources and details. Now you will apply your disquisitional thinking skills to the information yous recorded—analyzing how it is relevant, determining how it meshes with your ideas, and finding how it forms connections and patterns.
Writing at Work
When you create workplace documents based on inquiry, selectivity remains important. A project team may spend months conducting market surveys to prepare for rolling out a new production, simply few managers take time to read the research in its entirety. Near employees want the research distilled into a few well-supported points. Focused, concise writing is highly valued in the workplace.
Identify Information That Supports Your Thesis
Begin by identifying the notes that conspicuously support your thesis. Mark or group these, either physically or using the cut-and-paste function in your word processing program. As yous identify the crucial details that support your thesis, make sure y'all analyze them critically. Ask the following questions to focus your thinking:
Is this detail from a reliable, high-quality source? Is it advisable for me to cite this source in an bookish paper? The bulk of the support for your thesis should come from reliable, reputable sources. If near of the details that back up your thesis are from less-reliable sources, yous may demand to practice additional inquiry or modify your thesis.
Is the link between this information and my thesis obvious , or will I need to explain it to my readers? Think, yous accept spent more than time thinking and reading about this topic than your audience. Some connections might be obvious to both yous and your readers. More than oft, however, you volition need to provide the analysis or explanation that shows how the information supports your thesis. Every bit yous read through your notes, jot down ideas y'all have for making those connections clear.
What personal biases or experiences might bear upon the way I interpret this information? No researcher is 100 percent objective. We all have personal opinions and experiences that influence our reactions to what nosotros read and learn. Good researchers are aware of this human being tendency. They go on an open mind when they read opinions or facts that contradict their beliefs.
Tip
Information technology can exist tempting to ignore data that does not support your thesis or that contradicts it outright. However, such information is important. At the very least, it gives y'all a sense of what has been written about the issue. More importantly, it can help you question and refine your own thinking then that writing your research paper is a truthful learning process.
Find Connections between Your Sources
As y'all find connections betwixt your ideas and data in your sources, also look for data that connects your sources. Exercise about sources seem to agree on a particular idea? Are some facts mentioned repeatedly in many different sources? What fundamental terms or major concepts come up in almost of your sources regardless of whether the sources agree on the finer points? Identifying these connections will help you identify important ideas to talk over in your paper.
Wait for subtler ways your sources complement i another, too. Does one author refer to another's book or article? How do sources that are more contempo build upon the ideas developed in earlier sources?
Exist aware of any redundancies in your sources. If you take amassed solid support from a reputable source, such as a scholarly periodical, there is no need to cite the aforementioned facts from an online encyclopedia article that is many steps removed from any primary research. If a given source adds zilch new to your discussion and you can cite a stronger source for the same information, use the stronger source.
Determine how you lot will accost whatsoever contradictions establish amidst different sources. For instance, if i source cites a startling fact that you cannot confirm anywhere else, it is prophylactic to dismiss the data as unreliable. However, if you find meaning disagreements among reliable sources, you will need to review them and evaluate each source. Which source presents a more sound argument or more solid evidence? It is up to you to make up one's mind which source is the most credible and why.
Finally, do not ignore any information but because it does not support your thesis. Advisedly consider how that data fits into the big picture of your research. You may decide that the source is unreliable or the information is not relevant, or you may decide that it is an important point you need to bring up. What matters is that you lot give it conscientious consideration.
Self – practice EXERCISE eleven. 9
Consider the data you lot have included in the outline that was canonical by your instructor and the source information you compiled in Self – Exercise Exercise 11.8 . Utilise the information in this department to critically evaluate the usefulness, relevance, and appropriateness of the sources you have selected to support your ideas. Eliminate any that yous feel take you lot off topic or are non credible sources.
Key Takeaways
- An effective research newspaper focuses on presenting the writer's ideas using data from enquiry as support.
- Effective writers spend time reviewing, synthesizing, and organizing their research notes before they begin drafting a inquiry paper.
- It is of import for writers to revisit their research questions and working thesis as they transition from the research phase to the writing phrase of a project. Ordinarily, the working thesis will need at to the lowest degree minor adjustments.
- To organize a research paper, writers choose a construction that is appropriate for the topic and purpose. Longer papers may brand use of more than than one structure.
Journal entry #11
Write multiple paragraphs responding to the following. This is your final journal entry, and so you lot desire to make sure you reflect on what you have learned throughout the semester and your full general writing skills.
What is the topic effectually which y'all would like to base your persuasive essay word?
Why did you cull this topic?
What challenges do you think you may face up when writing about this topic?
Reflect on your writing skill development over the semester. Be as specific as possible.
What are you most confident doing? Due west hat do yous still need to practis due east?
What practise you lot think is your biggest accomplishment this semester?
Call up as mentioned in the Assessment Descriptions in your syllabus:
You lot will be expected to respond to the questions by reflecting on and discussing your experiences with the semester's cloth.
When writing your journals, you should focus on freewriting—writing without (overly) because formal writing structures – merely retrieve that it will be read past the teacher, who needs to exist able to understand your ideas.
Your instructor will brainstorm reading your Journal Package ii this week. (2.five%)
Source: https://opentextbc.ca/writingforsuccess/chapter/chapter-11-developing-a-convincing-argument/
Posting Komentar untuk "what peer review feedback did you choose to incorporate concerning your argument and why"