What Is Most Famous Paintings in the Metropolitan Museum of Art

April 25, 2022 Posting Komentar

The curation of this content is at the discretion of the writer, and not necessarily cogitating of the views of Encyclopaedia Britannica or its editorial staff. For the nigh accurate and up-to-appointment information, consult private encyclopedia entries about the topics.

These ten paintings have caused scandals and sparked mysteries—and you lot can detect them but at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York Urban center. First to unravel the complicated histories of Madame X, The Equus caballus Off-white, and more in this listing.

Earlier versions of the descriptions of these paintings starting time appeared in1001 Paintings You Must See Before Y'all Dice, edited by Stephen Farthing (2018). Writers' names announced in parentheses.

The Fortune Teller (probably 1630s)

La Tour, Georges de: The Fortune Teller
The Fortune Teller, oil on sheet by Georges de La Tour, probably 1630s; in the Metropolitan Museum of Fine art, New York City.
The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, Rogers Fund, 1960 (sixty.thirty), world wide web. metmuseum.org

Georges de La Tour secured an important patron, the duc de Lorraine and, in the belatedly 1630s, came to the find of Rex Louis 13. The rex was then impressed that it was said he insisted a painting by La Tour be the only 1 to be hung in his bedroom, reputedly having all previous paintings removed. In 1639 the painter was ordered to Paris, where the king paid him one,000 francs and gave him the title of "Sir Georges de La Tour, painter to the King." Although many of La Tour'southward works have been lost, information technology seems that his religious works tend to comprise fewer and more than detailed figures (usually just 1 or two people), whereas his morality pictures, such as The Fortune Teller, tend to be more than crowded. In this painting, a fashionably dressed young human being adopts an arrogant stance, paying so much attention to the fortune teller that he fails to find his pockets existence picked by her 3 assistants. The fortune teller is virtually a caricature in her ugliness and her client has an expression of compelled revulsion on his face, leading him to be bullheaded to the young thieves around him. La Tour painted several similar cautionary tales of young men being cheated, often at cards. (Ann Kay)
Portrait of Mademoiselle Charlotte du Val d'Ognes (1801)

In 1917, the Metropolitan Museum of Art acquired the unsigned Portrait of Mademoiselle Charlotte du Val d'Ognes, believing that it was painted by Jacques-Louis David. The sitter's classical white tunic, Grecian curls, and Spartan setting all reinforced this attribution, but in 1951 Charles Sterling, then manager of the museum, concluded that information technology had really been painted by one of David's students, a adult female named Constance Marie Charpentier. Since then, whether the painting, one of the Met's most popular, is the work of Charpentier or another woman painter of the era, Marie-Denise Villers, has been actively debated amid art historians and critics, though the Met now attributes information technology to Villers. This magnificent, luminous prototype of the bailiwick at her drawing board tin be read as a moving portrait of mutual respect between two female artists. Sterling's reattribution acquired this intimate portrait to be recognized as one of the well-nigh accomplished and well-regarded works by a female artist in Western history—but information technology also acquired its budgetary value to plummet. At the same time, critics began to ascribe "feminine attributes" to the epitome. French composer Francis Poulenc called the painting a "mysterious masterpiece," and information technology was termed "an eighteenth-century Mona Lisa." In his assessment, Sterling wrote: "Its verse, literary rather than plastic, its very evident charms, and cleverly concealed weakness, its ensemble fabricated upwardly from thousands of subtle attitudes, all seem to reveal the feminine spirit." (Ana Finel Honigman)
Fur Traders Descending the Missouri (1845)

Bingham, George Caleb: Fur Traders Descending the Missouri
Fur Traders Descending the Missouri, oil on canvas past George Caleb Bingham, 1845; in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York City.
The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, Morris K. Jesup Fund, 1933, (33.61), world wide web.metmuseum.org

George Caleb Bingham's paintings immortalize the vanished earth of the North American borderland. Bingham's solemn reverence for the landscape is characteristic of many mid-19th-century Realists, notwithstanding he represents its beauty with a unique sensitivity to colour and light. Subsequently completing merely a few months of formal training at the Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Arts, Bingham traveled through Europe and North America before settling in Missouri. There he dedicated himself to producing landscape scenes and representing the fishermen and trappers who had recently occupied the area. In 1856 Bingham traveled to Düsseldorf, Germany, to study, mastering the academic fashion of painting he then taught as the Professor of Art at the University of Missouri. His later piece of work is often criticized for its dry formalism and pedantic political undertones, rooted in his time as a local pol. Merely this earlier painting—showing ii trappers in the early morn, eyeing the viewer from their canoe, in which prevarication a dead duck and a tethered cat or bear cub—specially appealed to urban viewers, who were fascinated by its glamorization of the violence necessary for daily survival on the American frontier. Originally titled French-Trader—Half Breed Son, it was renamed when bought by the American Art Union. Bingham elegantly employs deft brushwork, a hitting, geometric composition, and clear, pure use of light to expose the hard-scrabble life of settlers and river men involved in the risky adventure of creating a new world. (Sara White Wilson)
Washington Crossing the Delaware (1851)

Emanuel Leutze: Washington Crossing the Delaware
Washington Crossing the Delaware, oil on canvas by Emanuel Leutze, 1851; in the Metropolitan Museum of Fine art, New York City.
The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, Gift of John Stewart Kennedy, 1897 (97.34), world wide web. metmuseum.org

No visitor to New York'due south Metropolitan Museum of Art will forget seeing Emanuel Leutze's Washington Crossing the Delaware. More than than 12 feet tall and 21 feet wide, this iconic film is truly larger than life. The painting depicts Washington and his ground forces dramatically crossing the icy river for a surprise dawn attack on the British at Trenton, New Jersey, on December 25, 1776. Leutze uses every imaginable device to heighten the drama and elicit an emotive response in the viewer: jagged chunks of water ice, whinnying horses, wounded soldiers, and a morn star speak of danger, courage, and hope. The heroic Washington stands noble and cock at the centre of the scene. Strangely enough, this symbol of America was actually painted in Germany. The German-American Leutze insisted on using American fine art students at the famous Düsseldorf Academy equally his models. At the time, the United States had recently expanded its boundaries to the Pacific Ocean through its victory in the Mexican State of war. Leutze, while painting the Delaware, imagined the spirit of Washington crossing western rivers, bringing the stars and stripes and thousands of American settlers with it. The original version of the painting was destroyed in the bombing of Bremen, Frg, in 1942. This surviving version was completed in 1851. (Daniel Robert Koch)
The Horse Off-white (1852–55)

Bonheur, Rosa: The Horse Fair
The Equus caballus Fair, oil on canvas by Rosa Bonheur, 1853; in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York City.
Photograph by dmadeo. The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York Metropolis, gift of Cornelius Vanderbilt, 1887 (87.25)

The creative person Rosa Bonheur was born in Bordeaux and learned the fundamentals of art from her begetter, the artist Raymond Bonheur. Her way changed petty throughout her career, and information technology remained grounded in Realism. Working at the aforementioned time as the Realists Gustave Courbet and Jean-François Millet, her work was based on authentic ascertainment from nature combined with excellent technical skills. She had a great amore for animals, in particular horses, and her understanding of animals, their nature, and their beefcake is obvious in her paintings. Her enormous canvas The Horse Fair is considered the artist'south greatest piece of work, but is too unusual within her style. Although the foundation of the painting is Realist, she approached her subject with a combination of the color and emotion of the Romantics, and in particular she was influenced at this point by the piece of work of Théodore Géricault, himself a great admirer of the horse. Bonheur fabricated sketching trips to a equus caballus market about Paris twice a calendar week for a year and a half before starting the painting, and on her trips she dressed equally a man to avert attention from passersby. Bonheur enjoyed fiscal success during her lifetime, however she was never properly appreciated past the critics and the art world; information technology may be that her feminist views and unconventional lifestyle led to her lack of popularity within the male-dominated bookish art circles. (Tamsin Pickeral)
The Champion Single Sculls (Max Schmitt in a Single Scull) (1871)

Thomas Eakinswas one of the greatest American artists of the 19th century, instilling a powerful and sometimes shocking sense of realism into his paintings. He spent most of his life in his native city of Philadelphia, though this picture dates from the showtime of his career, when he had just returned from 4 years studying in Europe (1866 to 1870), mostly in France and Spain. It was hardly surprising after such time abroad that he was anxious to plough his attention to the places and the activities that he had missed while abroad, specifically rowing scenes, of which he produced several paintings betwixt 1870 and 1874. This is probably the almost famous of them. It shows a adolescence friend, Max Schmitt, turning around to face the viewer. In his usual, fastidious way, Eakins arranged the entire composition and then that information technology included a number of references to Schmitt's contempo win of a prestigious single scull race. The autumnal setting was called to tally with the date of the race (October 5, 1870); the late-afternoon sky indicated the time that it took identify (5 p.m.); and Schmitt'due south scull was even located on the precise spot where the finishing line had been situated. As he was as addicted of rowing, Eakins decided to add together his own portrait to the moving-picture show, in the guise of the rower in the middle distance. To make things doubly articulate, he painted his signature and the picture'south appointment on the side of the gunkhole. (Iain Zaczek)
Madame X (1883–84)

John Singer Sargent, an American denizen largely brought upwardly in Europe, painted this remarkable portrait near the start of his career, when he was living in Paris. He hoped that information technology would make his proper noun and, indeed, information technology did, although not in the way he had envisaged. When it was exhibited, the film caused a scandal, prompting the artist to get out France. He had approached Virginie Gautreau, a famous society beauty, and asked to pigment her portrait. She was a fellow American and the wife of a wealthy French banker. She readily agreed to his request, but progress on the painting was slow; Virginie was a restless model, and at times Sargent plant her beauty "unpaintable." He altered the limerick several times earlier finally settling on a pose that accentuated her distinctive contour. The painting was finally displayed at the Paris Salon of 1884, and though the sitter was not formally identified, Virginie was then famous that many people recognized her. The public were shocked by her depression-cut apparel, bemused past her deathly white makeup, repelled by the awkward, twisted pose of her right arm, and, above all, outraged by the fact that one of her dress-straps was hanging off her shoulder—a sure sign of sexual impropriety. Gautreau's family were appalled and begged the artist to withdraw the painting. He wanted to repaint the shoulder-strap, but he was not allowed to do so until the exhibition was over. In the wake of the scandal, Sargent left Paris under a cloud, though he e'er maintained that the portrait was the finest matter he ever painted. (Iain Zaczek)
Lady at the Tea Table (1885)

Mary Cassatt's deceptively calm and casual paintings, which depict women in everyday situations, contain underlying layers of dramatic tension, emotional depth, and psychological insight. Cassatt, who was born in Pennsylvania only settled in Paris in 1874, was the only North American woman creative person invited to exhibit with the French Impressionists. Cassatt painted Mrs. Robert Moore Riddle, her mother's get-go cousin, for Lady at the Tea Table. The motion-picture show is remarkable for the subject field's air of dominance and the economic yet eloquent utilize of line and colour. Mrs. Riddle'due south girl was offended at Cassatt's realistic representation of her mother'due south nose, simply the painter herself was and then attached to the painting that she kept it for herself until gifting it to the Metropolitan Museum of Art in 1923. (Ana Finel Honigman)
Mrs. Walter Rathbone Bacon (1897)

Receiving early acclamation for his watercolors, during the 1880s Anders Zorn traveled extensively before settling in Paris and taking upward oil painting. Over the next few years he produced the work that was to make him 1 of the nearly sought-later on lodge portraitists of the age. It was on his second visit to America that Zorn painted this portrait of Mrs. Walter Rathbone Bacon (Virginia Purdy Barker). Virginia'south cousin, George Washington Vanderbilt II, had recently had John Singer Sargent—Zorn'southward great rival—pigment her portrait to hang in the halls of Biltmore Firm, the largest home in the country. Information technology was probably in response to this that Zorn was commissioned by her married man in early 1897. Here, although elegantly dressed and bejeweled, Virginia sits informally at home accompanied past her dog. (Richard Bell)
The Judgment of Paris (c. 1528)

Here 1 tin can see the influence the Italian Renaissance exerted on the German creative person Lucas Cranach the Elder. The Judgment of Paris was a favorite theme of Cranach'south (plus, the Greek myth allowed him to testify the female person nude from three different perspectives). His rendering of anatomy was oft inexact, as can be seen hither, especially in the left arm and elbow of the goddess with her back toward the viewer. Cranach is portraying a High german version of the myth in which Mercury presents the goddesses Juno, Venus, and Minerva to Paris in a dream and asks him to approximate who is the most cute of the three. Each goddess disrobed in front of him and promised him a great reward if he chose her. Paris chose Venus and presented her with a gilt apple (depicted hither as a glass orb). Venus's victory is signified by the artist placing Cupid, her son, in the upper left of the painting. (Lucinda Hawksley)
Francesco Sassetti and His Son Teodoro (c. 1487)

Domenico di Tommaso Curradi di Doffo Bigordi, known every bit Domenico Ghirlandaio, hailed from a long and proud tradition of successful craftsmen, merchants, and artists. An apocryphal story propagated by Giorgio Vasari credits the origin of the proper noun Ghirlandaio (from the give-and-take for "garland") to Ghirlandaio'southward father, who may have created a series of hair ornaments. Vasari also tells us that Ghirlandaio worked in the service of the Sassetti family. Employed in the Medici banks based in Avignon, Geneva, and Lyon, the wealthy patron Francesco Sassetti worked for both Piero de' Medici and Lorenzo Il Magnifico. This double portrait of father and son is complicated by the fact that Sassetti had ii sons, both of whom were called Teodoro. The younger son was built-in the year that the older one died. Information technology is thought that the younger son is depicted here, which dates the painting to 1487, although this remains uncertain. The stern paternal image of the banker is only softened past the innocence of the son who gazes direct into the eyes of his father. Intended to exist a formal portrait, the rigidity of the composition and the static, wide-shouldered man are offset by the floral patterning on the youth'southward clothing and his soft hands. The face up and torso of Sassetti are heavily repainted, which might explain the central figure'due south general blandness. In the groundwork, Ghirlandaio has painted an oratory built by Sassetti in Geneva. The same building is included in Ghirlandaio's frescoes, which he painted for Sassetti in Florence—a painter'south compliment to his patron. (Steven Pulimood)